docs(dependency injecton): rewrite

This commit is contained in:
Misko Hevery 2012-02-27 12:14:48 -08:00
parent 581f93ae56
commit 2e90cdc3d4
12 changed files with 244 additions and 290 deletions

View file

@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
@ngdoc overview
@name Developer Guide: About Dependency Injection (DI)
@description
Dependency Injection (DI) is an object-oriented software design pattern that supports the
decoupling and dependency management of application components.
The idea behind DI is to decouple each component from all of the other components that it depends
on to do its particular job. The way this is done in DI is by moving the responsibility for
managing dependencies out of each individual component and into a provider component. The provider
(or injector) component manages the life cycles and dependencies for all of the other components in
an application.
Angular has a built-in dependency management subsystem that helps to make your applications easier
to develop, understand, and test.
For more information on DI in general, see {@link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_injection
Dependency Injection} at Wikipedia, and {@link http://martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html
Inversion of Control} by Martin Fowler, or read about DI in your favorite software design pattern
book.
## Related Topics
* {@link dev_guide.di.understanding_di Understanding DI in Angular}
* {@link dev_guide.services Angular Services}
## Related API
* {@link api/angular.module.ng Service API}
* {@link api/angular.injector Angular Injector API}

View file

@ -1,193 +0,0 @@
@ngdoc overview
@name Developer Guide: DI: Understanding DI in Angular
@description
While DI is widely used in statically typed languages such as Java or C++, it has not been widely
used in JavaScript. Angular brings the benefits of DI into JavaScript apps.
In angular, DI is implemented as a subsystem that manages dependencies between services,
controllers, widgets, and filters.
Services are objects that handle common tasks in web applications. Angular provides several {@link
api/angular.module.ng built-in services}, and you can create your
{@link dev_guide.services.creating_services own custom services}.
The main job of angular's DI subsystem is to provide services to angular components that depend on
them. The way the DI subsystem provides services is as follows: all services are registered with
angular's {@link api/angular.module.ng service API}, and all components that depend on services
define those dependencies as a property (`$inject`). With this information, the DI subsystem
manages the creation of service objects and the provision of those objects to the components that
need them, at the time they need them. The following illustration steps through the sequence of
events:
<img src="img/guide/di_sequence_final.png">
In the illustration above, the dependency injection sequence proceeds as follows:
1. Module "phonecat" is created and all the service providers are registered with this module.
(the "ng" module is created by Angular behind the scenes as well)
2. `ngApp` triggers bootstrap sequence on given element, during which angular creates injector,
loads "phonecat" and "ng" modules and compiles the template.
3. The `ngController` directive implicitly creates a new child scope and instantiates
`PhoneListCtrl` controller.
4. Injector identifies the `$http` service as `PhoneListCtrl` controller's only dependency.
5. Injector checks its instances cache whether the `$http` service has already been instantiated.
If not uses the provider from the available modules to construct it.
6. Injector provides the instance of `$http` service to the `PhoneListCtrl` controller constructor.
## How Scope Relates to DI
The root scope of the application is just a service that is available for injection to any part of
the application under the service name "$rootScope".
## Inferring dependencies from the signature of the factory function or constructor
**EXPERIMENTAL FEATURE**: This is an experimental feature. See the important note at the end of
this section for drawbacks.
We resort to `$inject` and our own annotation because there is no way in JavaScript to get a list
of arguments. Or is there? It turns out that calling `.toString()` on a function returns the
function declaration along with the argument names as shown below:
<pre>
function myFn(a,b){}
expect(myFn.toString()).toEqual('function myFn(a,b){}');
</pre>
This means that angular can infer the function names after all and use that information to generate
the `$inject` annotation automatically. Therefore the following two function definitions are
equivalent:
<pre>
// given a user defined service
angular.module('module1', [], function($provide) {
$provide.factory('serviceA', ...);
});
// inject '$window', 'serviceA', curry 'name';
function fnA($window, serviceA, name){};
fnA.$inject = ['$window', 'serviceA'];
// inject '$window', 'serviceA', curry 'name';
function fnB($window, serviceA_, name){};
// implies: fnB.$inject = ['$window', 'serviceA'];
</pre>
If angular does not find a `$inject` annotation on the function, then it calls the `.toString()`
method and tries to infer what should be injected by using function argument names as dependency
identifiers.
**IMPORTANT**
Minifiers/obfuscators change the names of function arguments and will therefore break the `$inject`
inference. For this reason, either explicitly declare the `$inject` or do not use
minifiers/obfuscators. In the future, we may provide a pre-processor which will scan the source
code and insert the `$inject` into the source code so that it can be minified/obfuscated.
### Dependency inference and variable name shadowing
During inference, the injector considers argument names with leading and trailing underscores to be
equivivalent to the name without these underscores. For example `_fooSvc_` argument name is treated
as if it was `fooSvc`, this is useful especially in tests where variable name shadowing can cause
some friction. This is best illustrated on examples:
When testing a service, it's common to need a reference to it in every single test. This can be
done in jasmine with DI inference like this:
<pre>
describe('fooSvc', function() {
it('should do this thing', inject(function(fooSvc) {
//test fooSvc
}));
it('should do that thing', inject(function(fooSvc) {
//test fooSvc
}));
// more its
});
</pre>
... but having to inject the service over and over gets easily tiresome.
It's likely better to rewrite these tests with a use of jasmine's `beforeEach`:
<pre>
describe('fooSvc', function() {
var fooSvc;
beforeEach(inject(function(fooSvc) {
fooSvc = fooSvc; // DOESN'T WORK! outer fooSvc is being shadowed
}));
it('should do this thing', function() {
//test fooSvc
});
it('should do that thing', function() {
//test fooSvc
});
// more its
});
</pre>
This obviously won't work because `fooSvc` variable in the describe block is being shadowed by the
`fooSvc` argument of the beforeEach function. So we have to resort to alternative solutions, like
for example use of array notation to annotate the beforeEach fn:
<pre>
describe('fooSvc', function() {
var fooSvc;
beforeEach(inject(['fooSvc', function(fooSvc_) {
fooSvc = fooSvc_;
}]));
it('should do this thing', function() {
//test fooSvc
});
it('should do that thing', function() {
//test fooSvc
});
});
</pre>
That's better, but it's still annoying, especially if you have many services to inject.
To resolve this shadowing problem, the injector considers `_fooSvc_` argument names equal to
`fooSvc`, so the test can be rewritten like this:
<pre>
describe('fooSvc', function() {
var fooSvc;
beforeEach(inject(function(_fooSvc_) {
fooSvc = _fooSvc_;
}));
it('should do this thing', function() {
//test fooSvc
});
it('should do that thing', function() {
//test fooSvc
});
// more its
});
</pre>
## Related Topics
* {@link dev_guide.services Angular Services}
## Related API
* {@link api/angular.module.ng Services API}

View file

@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
@ngdoc overview
@name Developer Guide: DI: Using DI in Controllers
@description
The most common place to use dependency injection in angular applications is in {@link
dev_guide.mvc.understanding_controller controllers}. Here is a simple example:
<pre>
function MyController($location){
// do stuff with the $location service
}
MyController.$inject = ['$location'];
</pre>
In this example, the `MyController` constructor function takes one argument, the {@link
api/angular.module.ng.$location $location} service. Angular is then responsible for supplying the
instance of `$location` to the controller when the constructor is instantiated. There are two ways
to cause controller instantiation by configuring routes with the `$location` service, or by
referencing the controller from the HTML template, as follows:
<pre>
<!doctype html>
<html ng-controller="MyController" ng-app>
<script src="http://code.angularjs.org/angular.min.js"></script>
<body>
...
</body>
</html>
</pre>
When angular is instantiating your controller, it needs to know what services, if any, should be
injected (passed in as arguments) into the controller. Since there is no reflection in JavaScript,
we have to supply this information to angular in the form of an additional property on the
controller constructor function called `$inject`. Think of it as annotations for JavaScript.
<pre>
MyController.$inject = ['$location'];
</pre>
The information in `$inject` is then used by the {@link api/angular.injector injector} to call the
function with the correct arguments.
## Related Topics
* {@link dev_guide.di About Dependency Injection}
* {@link dev_guide.di.understanding_di Understanding Dependency Injection in Angular}
* {@link dev_guide.services Angular Services}
## Related API
* {@link api/angular.injector Angular Injector API}

View file

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The MVC pattern greatly summarized:
* Separate applications into distinct presentation, data, and logic components
* Encourage loose coupling between these components
Along with {@link dev_guide.services services} and {@link dev_guide.di dependency injection}, MVC
Along with {@link dev_guide.services services} and {@link di dependency injection}, MVC
makes angular applications better structured, easier to maintain and more testable.
The following topics explain how angular incorporates the MVC pattern into the angular way of

View file

@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ needed for a single view.
The most common way to keep controllers slim is by encapsulating work that doesn't belong to
controllers into services and then using these services in controllers via dependency injection.
This is discussed in the {@link dev_guide.di Dependency Injection} {@link dev_guide.services
This is discussed in the {@link di Dependency Injection} {@link dev_guide.services
Services} sections of this guide.
Do not use controllers for:

View file

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ to write your own custom services. To do this you begin by registering a service
with a module either via the {@link api/angular.module Module#factory api} or directly
via the {@link api/angular.module.AUTO.$provide $provide} api inside of module config function.
All angular services participate in {@link dev_guide.di dependency injection (DI)} by registering
All angular services participate in {@link di dependency injection (DI)} by registering
themselves with Angular's DI system (injector) under a `name` (id) as well as by declaring
dependencies which need to be provided for the factory function of the registered service. The
ability to swap dependencies for mocks/stubs/dummies in tests allows for services to be highly
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ create this instance when called.
# Dependencies
Services can not only be depended upon, but also have its own dependencies. These can be specified
as arguments of the factory function. {@link dev_guide.di.understanding_di Read more} about the DI
as arguments of the factory function. {@link di.understanding_di Read more} about the DI
in Angular and the use of array notation and $inject property to make DI annotation
minification-proof.

View file

@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
Services are a feature that angular brings to client-side web apps from the server side, where
services have been commonly used for a long time. Services in angular apps are substitutable
objects that are wired together using {@link dev_guide.di dependency injection (DI)}. Services are
most often used with {@link dev_guide.di dependency injection}, also a key feature of angular apps.
objects that are wired together using {@link di dependency injection (DI)}. Services are
most often used with {@link di dependency injection}, also a key feature of angular apps.
## Related Topics

View file

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ above). You can also create your own custom services.
## Related Topics
* {@link dev_guide.di About Angular Dependency Injection}
* {@link di About Angular Dependency Injection}
* {@link dev_guide.services.creating_services Creating Angular Services}
* {@link dev_guide.services.managing_dependencies Managing Service Dependencies}
* {@link dev_guide.services.testing_services Testing Angular Services}

View file

@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ myClass.doWork();
Notice that no global variables were harmed in the writing of this test.
Angular comes with {@link dev_guide.di dependency-injection} built in which makes the right thing
Angular comes with {@link di dependency-injection} built in which makes the right thing
easy to do, but you still need to do it if you wish to take advantage of the testability story.
## Controllers

234
docs/content/guide/di.ngdoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
@ngdoc overview
@name Developer Guide: Dependency Injection
@description
# Dependency Injection
Dependency Injection (DI) is a software design pattern that deals with how code gets hold of its
dependencies.
For in-depth discussion about DI, see {@link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_injection
Dependency Injection} at Wikipedia, {@link http://martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html
Inversion of Control} by Martin Fowler, or read about DI in your favorite software design pattern
book.
## DI in a nutshell
There are only three ways how an object or a function can get a hold of its dependencies:
1. The dependency can be created, typically using the `new` operator.
2. The dependency can be looked up by referring to a global variable.
3. The dependency can be passed in to where it is needed.
The first two option of creating or looking up dependencies are not optimal, because they hard
code the dependency, making it difficult, if not impossible, to modify the dependencies.
This is especially problematic in tests, where it is often desirable to provide mock dependencies
for test isolation.
The third option is the most viable, since it removes the responsibility of locating the
dependency from the component. The dependency is simply handed to the component.
<pre>
function SomeClass(greeter) {
this.greeter = greeter
}
SomeClass.prototype.doSomething = function(name) {
this.greeter.greet(name);
}
</pre>
In the above example the `SomeClass` is not concerned with locating the `greeter` dependency, it
is simply handed the `greeter` at runtime.
This is desirable, but it puts the responsibility of getting hold of the dependency onto the
code responsible for the construction of `SomeClass`.
To manage the responsibility of dependency creation, each angular application has an {@link
api/angular.injector injector}. The injector is a service locator that is responsible for
construction and lookup of dependencies.
Here is an example of using the injector service.
<pre>
// Provide the wiring information in a module
angular.module('myModule', []).
// Teach the injector how to build a 'greeter'
// Notice that greeter itself is dependent on '$window'
factory('greeter', function($window) {
// This is a factory function, and is responsible for
// creating the 'greet' service.
return {
greet: function(text) {
$window.alert(text);
}
};
}).
// New injector is created from the module.
// (This is usually done automatically by angular bootstrap)
var injector = angular.injector('myModule');
// Request any dependency from the injector
var greeter = injector.get('greeter');
</pre>
Asking for dependencies solves the issue of hard coding, but it also means that the injector needs
to be passed throughout the application. Passing the injector breaks the {@link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Demeter Law of Demeter}. To remedy this, we turn the
dependency lookup responsibility to the injector by declaring the dependencies as in this example:
<pre>
<!-- Given this HTML -->
<div ng-controller="MyController">
<button ng-click="sayHello()">Hello</button>
</div>
</pre>
<pre>
// And this controller definition
function MyController($scope, greeter) {
$scope.sayHello = function() {
greeter('Hello World');
};
}
// The 'ng-controller' directive does this behind the scenes
injector.instantiate(MyController);
</pre>
Notice that by having the `ng-controller` instantiate the class, it can satisfy all of the
dependencies of the `MyController` without the controller ever knowing about the injector. This is
the best outcome. The application code simply ask for the dependencies it needs, without having to
deal with the injector. This setup does not break the Law of Demeter.
# Dependency Annotation
How does the injector know what service needs to be injected?
The application developer needs to provide annotation information, that the injector uses in order
to resolve the dependencies. Throughout Angular certain API functions are invoked using the
injector, as per the API documentation. The injector needs to know what services to inject into
the function. Below are three equivalent ways of annotating your code with service name
information. These can be used interchangeably as you see fit and are equivalent.
# Inferring Dependencies
The simplest way to get hold of the dependencies, is to assume that the function parameter names
are the names of the dependencies.
<pre>
function MyController($scope, greeter) {
...
}
</pre>
Given a function the injector can infer the names of the service to inject by examining the
function declaration and extracting the parameter names. In the above example `$scope`, and
`greeter` are two services which need to be injected into the function.
While straightforward, this method will not work with JavaScript minifiers/obfuscators as they
rename the method parameter names. This makes this way of annotating only useful for {@link
http://www.pretotyping.org/ pretotyping}, and demo applications.
# `$inject` Annotation
To allow the minifers to rename the function parameters and still be able to inject right services
the function needs to be annotate with the `$inject` property. The `$inject` property is an array
of service names to inject.
<pre>
var MyController = function(renamed$scope, renamedGreeter) {
...
}
MyController.$inject = ['$scope', 'greeter'];
</pre>
Care must be taken that the `$inject` annotation is kept in sync with the actual arguments in the
function declaration.
This method of annotation is useful for controller declarations since it assigns the annotation
information with the function.
# Inline Annotation
Sometimes using the `$inject` annotation style is not convenient such as when annotating
directives.
For example:
<pre>
someModule.factory('greeter', function($window) {
...;
});
</pre>
Results in code bloat do to the need of temporary variable:
<pre>
var greeterFactory = function(renamed$window) {
...;
};
greeterFactory.$inject = ['$window'];
someModule.factory('greeter', greeterFactory);
</pre>
For this reason the third annotation style is provided as well.
<pre>
someModule.factory('greeter', ['$window', function(renamed$window) {
...;
}]);
</pre>
Keep in mind that all of the annotation styles are equivalent and can be used anywhere in Angular
where injection is supported.
# Where can I use DI?
DI is pervasive throughout Angular. It is typically used in controllers and factory methods.
## DI in controllers
Controllers are classes which are responsible for application behavior. Recommended way of
declaring controllers is:
<pre>
var MyController = function(dep1, dep2) {
...
}
MyController.$inject = ['dep1', 'dep2'];
MyController.prototype.aMethod = function() {
...
}
</pre>
## Factory methods
Factory methods are responsible for creating most objects in Angular. Examples are directives,
services, and filters. The factory methods are register with the module, and the recommended way
of declaring factories is:
<pre>
angualar.module('myModule', []).
config(['depProvider', function(depProvider){
...
}]).
factory('serviceId', ['depService', function(depService) {
...
}]).
directive('directiveName', ['depService', function(depService) {
...
}]).
filter('filterName', ['depService', function(depService) {
...
}]).
run(['depService', function(depService) {
...
}]);
</pre>

View file

@ -44,7 +44,4 @@ of the following documents before returning here to the Developer Guide:
* {@link dev_guide.services.managing_dependencies Managing Service Dependencies}
* {@link dev_guide.services.testing_services Testing Angular Services}
## {@link dev_guide.di About Dependency Injection}
* {@link dev_guide.di.understanding_di Understanding DI in Angular}
* {@link dev_guide.di.using_di_controllers Using DI in Controllers}
## {@link di About Dependency Injection}

View file

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
*
* @description
* Creates an injector function that can be used for retrieving services as well as for
* dependency injection (see {@link guide/dev_guide.di dependency injection}).
* dependency injection (see {@link guide/di dependency injection}).
*
* @param {Array.<string|Function>} modules A list of module functions or their aliases. See