docs(guide/directive): rephrase for consistency

- referring to `=attr` rather than `=prop` is consistent with note under example with =customerInfo
- change `prop` to `attr` (basically `prop` refers to property in JS object, `attr` is for HTML tag)
- change the function name in description to match the name in code example

Closes #5786
This commit is contained in:
Roy Ling 2014-01-14 15:44:31 +08:00 committed by Caitlin Potter
parent 61eb426ab4
commit 51a7f9dc4a

View file

@ -734,13 +734,13 @@ own behavior to it.
We want to run the function we pass by invoking it from the directive's scope, but have it run
in the context of the scope where its registered.
We saw earlier how to use `=prop` in the `scope` option, but in the above example, we're using
`&prop` instead. `&` bindings expose a function to an isolated scope allowing the isolated scope
We saw earlier how to use `=attr` in the `scope` option, but in the above example, we're using
`&attr` instead. `&` bindings expose a function to an isolated scope allowing the isolated scope
to invoke it, but maintaining the original scope of the function. So when a user clicks the
`x` in the dialog, it runs `Ctrl`'s `close` function.
`x` in the dialog, it runs `Ctrl`'s `hideDialog` function.
<div class="alert alert-success">
**Best Practice:** use `&prop` in the `scope` option when you want your directive
**Best Practice:** use `&attr` in the `scope` option when you want your directive
to expose an API for binding to behaviors.
</div>