doc(guide): Fixed typos at the unit tests guide

This commit is contained in:
Shai Reznik 2013-01-14 02:21:04 +02:00 committed by Brian Ford
parent a6b2ee785b
commit ef7a61a67e

View file

@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ There are several ways in which you can get a hold of a dependency:
1. You could create it using the `new` operator.
2. You could look for it in a well known place, also known as global singleton.
3. You could ask a registry (also known as service registry) for it. (But how do you get a hold of
the registry? Must likely by looking it up in a well known place. See #2)
the registry? Most likely by looking it up in a well known place. See #2)
4. You could expect that it be handed to you.
Out of the list above only the last option is testable. Let's look at why:
Out of the four options in the list above, only the last one is testable. Let's look at why:
### Using the `new` operator
@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ function MyClass() {
}
</pre>
However, where dose the serviceRegistry come from? if it is:
However, where does the serviceRegistry come from? if it is:
* `new`-ed up, the the test has no chance to reset the services for testing
* global look-up, then the service returned is global as well (but resetting is easier, since
there is only one global variable to be reset).
@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ and the test is straight forward
var pc = new PasswordCtrl();
pc.password('abc');
pc.grade();
expect(span.strength).toEqual('weak');
expect(pc.strength).toEqual('weak');
</pre>
Notice that the test is not only much shorter but it is easier to follow what is going on. We say