Before, there we multiple overview docs:
- guide/overview
- guide/introduction
- guide/dev_guide.mvc
- guide/dev_guide.mvc.understanding_model
- guide/dev_guide.mvc.understanding_view
- guide/concepts
Now we have:
- guide/introduction: High level description of Angular with the key benefits but without code or any concrete concepts
- guide/concepts: explains all important concepts with a simple example and contains deep links to the other parts of the guide.
All the old information was moved into existing documents or deleted when they were duplicates.
When navigating to URLs such as
docs.angularjs.org/api/ng#filter, the browser
was not able to navigate to the named anchor,
"filter," because the anchor did not yet exist
in the DOM.
This fix uses the $anchorScroll service
to automatically scroll to the right place when
the content has been added to the page.
Fixes#4703
The example about transclusion and scopes worked only because the order of `scope` and `element`
arguments is wrong, which means that the `name' property of the scope is not really being updated.
To really work, the directive has to define its own scope, either a new child scope or, as is more
common with transclusion, an isolated scope.
Closes#4774
BREAKING CHANGE:
This commit introduces the notion of "private" properties (properties
whose names begin and/or end with an underscore) on the scope chain.
These properties will not be available to Angular expressions (i.e. {{
}} interpolation in templates and strings passed to `$parse`) They are
freely available to JavaScript code (as before).
Motivation
----------
Angular expressions execute in a limited context. They do not have
direct access to the global scope, Window, Document or the Function
constructor. However, they have direct access to names/properties on
the scope chain. It has been a long standing best practice to keep
sensitive APIs outside of the scope chain (in a closure or your
controller.) That's easier said that done for two reasons: (1)
JavaScript does not have a notion of private properties so if you need
someone on the scope chain for JavaScript use, you also expose it to
Angular expressions, and (2) the new "controller as" syntax that's now
in increased usage exposes the entire controller on the scope chain
greatly increaing the exposed surface. Though Angular expressions are
written and controlled by the developer, they (1) typically deal with
user input and (2) don't get the kind of test coverage that JavaScript
code would. This commit provides a way, via a naming convention, to
allow publishing/restricting properties from controllers/scopes to
Angular expressions enabling one to only expose those properties that
are actually needed by the expressions.
If you have zoomed into the page in your browser then the screen coordinate system no longer
matches the page coordinate system. To ensure that dragged elements work correctly when zoomed
we should use pageX/pageY rather than screenX/screenY.
Closes#4687
The non-global controller test throws an error because the test does not
know about the module and so can not find the controller. This change
tells the test about the module so the test can find the controller.
Closes#4489
The example that demonstrates how to parse expressions can fail if you
pass in the same expression twice. By using "track by $index" we can
fix this.
Closes#4472
Remove mention of global controller functions
Convert larger examples to runnable demos
Remove mention of pre-1.0 controllers, in particular discussion of
controller inheritance.
TODO: Probably could do with updating to explain the "controller as" syntax
at some point.
Closes: #4373
Objects received from outside AngularJS may have had their `hasOwnProperty`
method overridden with something else. In cases where we can do this without
incurring a performance penalty we call directly on Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
to ensure that we use the correct method.
Also, we have some internal hash objects, where the keys for the map are provided
from outside AngularJS. In such cases we either prevent `hasOwnProperty` from
being used as a key or provide some other way of preventing our objects from
having their `hasOwnProperty` overridden.
BREAKING CHANGE: Inputs with name equal to "hasOwnProperty" are not allowed inside
form or ngForm directives.
Before, inputs whose name was "hasOwnProperty" were quietly ignored and not added
to the scope. Now a badname exception is thrown.
Using "hasOwnProperty" for an input name would be very unusual and bad practice.
Either do not include such an input in a `form` or `ngForm` directive or change
the name of the input.
Closes#3331
The use of 'angular' as sample text is confusing to the newbie in that they are forced
to confirm that the text 'angular' is not a keyword or otherwise referring to a system
component. This is changed to a more obvious sample text.
The most common form of `ngBind` is moved to the top of the list.
Closes#4237
The demo of the hash-bang vs html5-mode deep links was broken since the introduction
of a check for previously bootstrapped elements. See this commit: 3ee744cc63
We fix this problem by applying a null for the injector value of the element of the
at the root of the sub-app.
It also turns out that it was not necessary, and if fact broke the demo, to replace
the $document service for the sub-app. This was because the $compile service calls
`$document.createElement()`, which doesn't exist on a `div`.
Finally, the bootstrap CSS was limiting the width of the ngAddress bar input box,
which made it difficult to see the changing URLs.
The host.com links on this documentation page took you to an ad page of dubious content.
Now changed to example.com, in accordance with RFC 2606
Closes#4206
Change return value of docsApp.serviceFactory.prepareDefaultAppModule
to include empty array `[]` instead of array containing one empty
string element `['']`.
This will correct script.js for simple plunkr/jsfiddle examples such
as [ngChecked](http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngChecked).