This fixes an inconsistency where you can't call the setter function
when the expression resolves to a top level field name on a promise.
Setting a field on an unresolved promise will throw an exception. (This
shouldn't really happen in your template/js code and points to a
programming error.)
Closes#1827
Add '?' token to lexer, add ternary rule to parser at
(hopefully) proper precedence and associativity (based
on https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Operator_Precedence).
Since (exp1 && exp2 || exp3) is supported by the parser,
and (exp1 ? exp2 : exp3) works the same way, it seems
reasonable to add this minor form of control to templates
(see #719).
* `literal` is set to true if the expression's top-level is a JavaScript
literal (number, string, boolean, null/undefined, array, object), even
if it contains non-literals inside.
* `constant` is set to true if the expression is known to be made
entirely of constant values, i.e., evaluating it will always yield the
same result.
A consequence is that a JSON expression is guaranteed to be both literal
and constant.
CSP (content security policy) forbids apps to use eval or
Function(string) generated functions (among other things). For us to be
compatible, we just need to implement the "getterFn" in $parse without
violating any of these restrictions.
We currently use Function(string) generated functions as a speed
optimization. With this change, it will be possible to opt into the CSP
compatible mode using the ngCsp directive. When this mode is on Angular
will evaluate all expressions up to 30% slower than in non-CSP mode, but
no security violations will be raised.
In order to use this feature put ngCsp directive on the root element of
the application. For example:
<!doctype html>
<html ng-app ng-csp>
...
...
</html>
Closes#893
