We need to wait until animations have added the content to the document before
trying to `autoscroll` to anchors that may have been inserted.
Fixes#4723
BREAKING CHANGE
ngAnimate addClass / removeClass animations are now applied right away. This means
that as soon as the animation starts the class will be added (addClass) or removed
(removeClass) to the element being animated instead of after the -add-active /
-remove-active animations are completed. This allows for animations outside of
ngAnimate to not conflict with $animate.
This commit introduces beforeAddClass and beforeRemoveClass animation event functions and
executes any addClass and removeClass event functions AFTER the class has been added or
removed (this is opposite functionality of how ngAnimate used to work when performing
JS-enabled animations addClass / removeClass animations). If your animation code relies on
any animations being performed prior to the class change then simply use the new
beforeAddClass and beforeRemoveClass animation event functions.
Finally, when animating show and hide animations using CSS transitions or keyframe animations,
ng-hide-remove doesn't require `display:block!important` for ng-hide-add anymore.
The msie variable is a global variable used within the ng core which contains the
version number for the current Internet Explorer browser that is rendering the
application. Other modules outside of the ng core could make use of this variable
instead of having to rollout duplicate detection code. This code makes it easy to
reuse this simple property within the $sniffer service.
Due to animations, DOM might get destroyed much later than scope and so the element $destroy event
might get fired outside of $digest, which causes changes to the validation model go unobserved
until the next digest. By deregistering on scope event, the deregistration always happens
in $digest and the form validation model changes will be observed.
Closes#4226Closes#4779
BREAKING CHANGE:
This commit introduces the notion of "private" properties (properties
whose names begin and/or end with an underscore) on the scope chain.
These properties will not be available to Angular expressions (i.e. {{
}} interpolation in templates and strings passed to `$parse`) They are
freely available to JavaScript code (as before).
Motivation
----------
Angular expressions execute in a limited context. They do not have
direct access to the global scope, Window, Document or the Function
constructor. However, they have direct access to names/properties on
the scope chain. It has been a long standing best practice to keep
sensitive APIs outside of the scope chain (in a closure or your
controller.) That's easier said that done for two reasons: (1)
JavaScript does not have a notion of private properties so if you need
someone on the scope chain for JavaScript use, you also expose it to
Angular expressions, and (2) the new "controller as" syntax that's now
in increased usage exposes the entire controller on the scope chain
greatly increaing the exposed surface. Though Angular expressions are
written and controlled by the developer, they (1) typically deal with
user input and (2) don't get the kind of test coverage that JavaScript
code would. This commit provides a way, via a naming convention, to
allow publishing/restricting properties from controllers/scopes to
Angular expressions enabling one to only expose those properties that
are actually needed by the expressions.
When using ngIf with ngInclude on the same element, ngIf previously did not remove
elements added by ngInclude. Similarly, when using ngIfStart/End, ngIf will miss
elements added between the start/end markers added after ngIf is linked.
This commit changes the behavior of ngIf to add a comment node at the end of its
elements such that elements between the starting comment and this ending comment
are removed when ngIf's predicate does not hold.
The name of the example module is `ngView`, which might cause needless confusion.
Changed name to `ngViewExample`, which should make it clearer.
Closes#4702
Annotation allows the angular-mocks to be minified, which sometimes happens with frameworks that
automatically process files before running tests.
Also, some developers have been using this library in code for their applications.
This is not recommended as the library is only designed to support testing and not production
applications. If you are likely to want to use the code here in production you would be best
forking and maintaining your own version of the code as we will not guarantee that we won't
break the annotation of the code in the future.
Closes#4448
Recently we changed the priority of attribute interpolation directive to -100
to ensure that it executes early in the post linking phase. This causes issues
with when terminal directives are placed on elements with attribute bindings
because the terminal directive will usually have 0 or higher priority which
results in attr interpolation directive not being applied to the element.
To fix this issue I'm switching the priority back to 100 and making moving the
binding setup into the pre-linking function.
This means that:
- terminal directives with priority lower than 100 will not affect the attribute
binding
- if a directive wants to add or alter bindings it can do so in the pre-linking
phase, as long as the priority of this directive is more than 100
- all post-linking functions will execute after the attribute binding has been
set up
- all pre-linking functions with directive priority lower than 100 will execute
after the attribute bindings have been setup
BREAKING CHANGE: the attribute interpolation (binding) executes as a directive
with priority 100 and the binding is set up in the pre-linking phase. It used
to be that the priority was -100 in rc.2 (100 before rc.2) and that the binding
was setup in the post-linking phase.
Closes#4525Closes#4528Closes#4649
Skip addClass animations if the element already contains the class that is being
added to element. Also skip removeClass animations if the element does not contain
the class that is being removed.
Closes#4401Closes#2332
