Recently we changed the priority of attribute interpolation directive to -100
to ensure that it executes early in the post linking phase. This causes issues
with when terminal directives are placed on elements with attribute bindings
because the terminal directive will usually have 0 or higher priority which
results in attr interpolation directive not being applied to the element.
To fix this issue I'm switching the priority back to 100 and making moving the
binding setup into the pre-linking function.
This means that:
- terminal directives with priority lower than 100 will not affect the attribute
binding
- if a directive wants to add or alter bindings it can do so in the pre-linking
phase, as long as the priority of this directive is more than 100
- all post-linking functions will execute after the attribute binding has been
set up
- all pre-linking functions with directive priority lower than 100 will execute
after the attribute bindings have been setup
BREAKING CHANGE: the attribute interpolation (binding) executes as a directive
with priority 100 and the binding is set up in the pre-linking phase. It used
to be that the priority was -100 in rc.2 (100 before rc.2) and that the binding
was setup in the post-linking phase.
Closes#4525Closes#4528Closes#4649
Skip addClass animations if the element already contains the class that is being
added to element. Also skip removeClass animations if the element does not contain
the class that is being removed.
Closes#4401Closes#2332
When we re-enter compilation either due to async directive templates or element transclude directive
we need to keep track of controllers to instantiate during linking.
This piece of info was missing when re-entering compilation and that's what this commit fixes.
I also reordered the properties in the previousCompileContext object.
Closes#4434Closes#4616
A common mistake for beginners is to attach a controller in both the
$routeProvider and also in the html document using the ng-controller
directive. This change highlights this, to help prevent developers from
doing so in the future.
Closes#4409
fix ngAnimate throwing exception in cancelChildAnimations on deletion of
element (ngAnimate's leave decorator) of repeated element when using
ng-include on this element.
Closes#4548
When we refactored , we broke the csp mode because the previous implementation
relied on the fact that it was ok to lazy initialize the .csp property, this
is not the case any more.
Besides, we need to know about csp mode during bootstrap and avoid injecting the
stylesheet when csp is active, so I refactored the code to fix both issues.
PR #4411 will follow up on this commit and add more improvements.
Closes#917Closes#2963Closes#4394Closes#4444
BREAKING CHANGE: triggering ngCsp directive via `ng:csp` attribute is not
supported any more. Please use data-ng-csp instead.
Firefox and (sometimes) Opera may not provide a timeStamp value in their event when passed
to the event handler. This may cause animations not to close properly. This fix will automatically
create a timeStamp value for the event in this situation when missing.
Closes#3053
Issue an error and abort compilation when two directives that ask for transclusion are found
on a single element. This configuration is not supported and we previously failed to issue
the error because in the case of element transclusion the compilation is re-started and this
caused the compilation context to be lost.
The ngRepeat directive has been special-cased to bypass this warning because it knows how to
handle this scenario internally.
This is not an ideal solution to the problem of multiple transclusions per element, we are
hoping to have this configuration supported by the compiler in the future. See #4357.
Closes#3893Closes#4217Closes#3307
BREAKING CHANGE: the priority of ngRepeat, ngSwitchWhen, ngIf,
ngInclude and ngView has changed. This could affect directives that
explicitly specify their priority.
In order to make ngRepeat, ngSwitchWhen, ngIf, ngInclude and ngView
work together in all common scenarios their directives are being
adjusted to achieve the following precendence:
Directive | Old Priority | New Priority
=============================================
ngRepeat | 1000 | 1000
---------------------------------------------
ngSwitchWhen | 500 | 800
---------------------------------------------
ngIf | 1000 | 600
---------------------------------------------
ngInclude/ngView | 1000 | 400
Array.prototype.sort is speced out to be as potentionally unstable sort,
which is how it's implemented in FF and IE. This has caused the order
of directives with the same priority to vary between browsers.
For consistency sake, we now consider directive name and registration,
order when determining the order of directives with the same priority.
Note: it is still possible to get into a situation when the directive
order is underministic - when source files are loaded asynchronously
in non-deterministic order and there are are directives registered
with the same name and priority, the order in which they will be applied
will depend on the file load order.
