mirror of
https://github.com/Hopiu/django-model-utils.git
synced 2026-03-16 20:00:23 +00:00
Remove documentation from README
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a24ab0a37
commit
1ff3f267f9
1 changed files with 0 additions and 516 deletions
516
README.rst
516
README.rst
|
|
@ -11,25 +11,6 @@ django-model-utils
|
|||
|
||||
Django model mixins and utilities.
|
||||
|
||||
Installation
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
Install from PyPI with ``pip``::
|
||||
|
||||
pip install django-model-utils
|
||||
|
||||
To use ``django-model-utils`` in your Django project, just import and
|
||||
use the utility classes described below; there is no need to modify
|
||||
your ``INSTALLED_APPS`` setting.
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
``django-model-utils`` supports `Django`_ 1.4.2 and later on Python 2.6, 2.7,
|
||||
3.2, and 3.3.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _Django: http://www.djangoproject.com/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Contributing
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,500 +27,3 @@ pull requests tracked in it are closed, but all new issues should be filed at
|
|||
GitHub.)
|
||||
|
||||
.. _BitBucket: https://bitbucket.org/carljm/django-model-utils/overview
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Choices
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
``Choices`` provides some conveniences for setting ``choices`` on a Django model field:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from model_utils import Choices
|
||||
|
||||
class Article(models.Model):
|
||||
STATUS = Choices('draft', 'published')
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
status = models.CharField(choices=STATUS, default=STATUS.draft, max_length=20)
|
||||
|
||||
A ``Choices`` object is initialized with any number of choices. In the
|
||||
simplest case, each choice is a string; that string will be used both
|
||||
as the database representation of the choice, and the human-readable
|
||||
representation. Note that you can access options as attributes on the
|
||||
``Choices`` object: ``STATUS.draft``.
|
||||
|
||||
But you may want your human-readable versions translated, in which
|
||||
case you need to separate the human-readable version from the DB
|
||||
representation. In this case you can provide choices as two-tuples:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from model_utils import Choices
|
||||
|
||||
class Article(models.Model):
|
||||
STATUS = Choices(('draft', _('draft')), ('published', _('published')))
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
status = models.CharField(choices=STATUS, default=STATUS.draft, max_length=20)
|
||||
|
||||
But what if your database representation of choices is constrained in
|
||||
a way that would hinder readability of your code? For instance, you
|
||||
may need to use an ``IntegerField`` rather than a ``CharField``, or
|
||||
you may want the database to order the values in your field in some
|
||||
specific way. In this case, you can provide your choices as triples,
|
||||
where the first element is the database representation, the second is
|
||||
a valid Python identifier you will use in your code as a constant, and
|
||||
the third is the human-readable version:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from model_utils import Choices
|
||||
|
||||
class Article(models.Model):
|
||||
STATUS = Choices((0, 'draft', _('draft')), (1, 'published', _('published')))
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
status = models.IntegerField(choices=STATUS, default=STATUS.draft)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
StatusField
|
||||
===========
|
||||
|
||||
A simple convenience for giving a model a set of "states."
|
||||
``StatusField`` is a ``CharField`` subclass that expects to find a
|
||||
``STATUS`` class attribute on its model, and uses that as its
|
||||
``choices``. Also sets a default ``max_length`` of 100, and sets its
|
||||
default value to the first item in the ``STATUS`` choices:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from model_utils.fields import StatusField
|
||||
from model_utils import Choices
|
||||
|
||||
class Article(models.Model):
|
||||
STATUS = Choices('draft', 'published')
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
status = StatusField()
|
||||
|
||||
(The ``STATUS`` class attribute does not have to be a `Choices`_
|
||||
instance, it can be an ordinary list of two-tuples).
|
||||
|
||||
``StatusField`` does not set ``db_index=True`` automatically; if you
|
||||
expect to frequently filter on your status field (and it will have
|
||||
enough selectivity to make an index worthwhile) you may want to add this
|
||||
yourself.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
MonitorField
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
A ``DateTimeField`` subclass that monitors another field on the model,
|
||||
and updates itself to the current date-time whenever the monitored
|
||||
field changes:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from model_utils.fields import MonitorField, StatusField
|
||||
|
||||
class Article(models.Model):
|
||||
STATUS = Choices('draft', 'published')
|
||||
|
||||
status = StatusField()
|
||||
status_changed = MonitorField(monitor='status')
|
||||
|
||||
(A ``MonitorField`` can monitor any type of field for changes, not only a
|
||||
``StatusField``.)
|
||||
|
||||
SplitField
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
A ``TextField`` subclass that automatically pulls an excerpt out of
|
||||
its content (based on a "split here" marker or a default number of
|
||||
initial paragraphs) and stores both its content and excerpt values in
|
||||
the database.
|
||||
|
||||
A ``SplitField`` is easy to add to any model definition:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from django.db import models
|
||||
from model_utils.fields import SplitField
|
||||
|
||||
class Article(models.Model):
|
||||
title = models.CharField(max_length=100)
|
||||
body = SplitField()
|
||||
|
||||
``SplitField`` automatically creates an extra non-editable field
|
||||
``_body_excerpt`` to store the excerpt. This field doesn't need to be
|
||||
accessed directly; see below.
|
||||
|
||||
Accessing a SplitField on a model
|
||||
---------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
When accessing an attribute of a model that was declared as a
|
||||
``SplitField``, a ``SplitText`` object is returned. The ``SplitText``
|
||||
object has three attributes:
|
||||
|
||||
``content``:
|
||||
The full field contents.
|
||||
``excerpt``:
|
||||
The excerpt of ``content`` (read-only).
|
||||
``has_more``:
|
||||
True if the excerpt and content are different, False otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
This object also has a ``__unicode__`` method that returns the full
|
||||
content, allowing ``SplitField`` attributes to appear in templates
|
||||
without having to access ``content`` directly.
|
||||
|
||||
Assuming the ``Article`` model above:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: pycon
|
||||
|
||||
>>> a = Article.objects.all()[0]
|
||||
>>> a.body.content
|
||||
u'some text\n\n<!-- split -->\n\nmore text'
|
||||
>>> a.body.excerpt
|
||||
u'some text\n'
|
||||
>>> unicode(a.body)
|
||||
u'some text\n\n<!-- split -->\n\nmore text'
|
||||
|
||||
Assignment to ``a.body`` is equivalent to assignment to
|
||||
``a.body.content``.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
a.body.excerpt is only updated when a.save() is called
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Customized excerpting
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
By default, ``SplitField`` looks for the marker ``<!-- split -->``
|
||||
alone on a line and takes everything before that marker as the
|
||||
excerpt. This marker can be customized by setting the ``SPLIT_MARKER``
|
||||
setting.
|
||||
|
||||
If no marker is found in the content, the first two paragraphs (where
|
||||
paragraphs are blocks of text separated by a blank line) are taken to
|
||||
be the excerpt. This number can be customized by setting the
|
||||
``SPLIT_DEFAULT_PARAGRAPHS`` setting.
|
||||
|
||||
TimeFramedModel
|
||||
===============
|
||||
|
||||
An abstract base class for any model that expresses a time-range. Adds
|
||||
``start`` and ``end`` nullable DateTimeFields, and a ``timeframed``
|
||||
manager that returns only objects for whom the current date-time lies
|
||||
within their time range.
|
||||
|
||||
StatusModel
|
||||
===========
|
||||
|
||||
Pulls together `StatusField`_, `MonitorField`_ and `QueryManager`_
|
||||
into an abstract base class for any model with a "status."
|
||||
|
||||
Just provide a ``STATUS`` class-attribute (a `Choices`_ object or a
|
||||
list of two-tuples), and your model will have a ``status`` field with
|
||||
those choices, a ``status_changed`` field containing the date-time the
|
||||
``status`` was last changed, and a manager for each status that
|
||||
returns objects with that status only:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from model_utils.models import StatusModel
|
||||
from model_utils import Choices
|
||||
|
||||
class Article(StatusModel):
|
||||
STATUS = Choices('draft', 'published')
|
||||
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
|
||||
a = Article()
|
||||
a.status = Article.STATUS.published
|
||||
|
||||
# this save will update a.status_changed
|
||||
a.save()
|
||||
|
||||
# this query will only return published articles:
|
||||
Article.published.all()
|
||||
|
||||
InheritanceManager
|
||||
==================
|
||||
|
||||
This manager (`contributed by Jeff Elmore`_) should be attached to a base model
|
||||
class in a model-inheritance tree. It allows queries on that base model to
|
||||
return heterogenous results of the actual proper subtypes, without any
|
||||
additional queries.
|
||||
|
||||
For instance, if you have a ``Place`` model with subclasses ``Restaurant`` and
|
||||
``Bar``, you may want to query all Places:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
nearby_places = Place.objects.filter(location='here')
|
||||
|
||||
But when you iterate over ``nearby_places``, you'll get only ``Place``
|
||||
instances back, even for objects that are "really" ``Restaurant`` or ``Bar``.
|
||||
If you attach an ``InheritanceManager`` to ``Place``, you can just call the
|
||||
``select_subclasses()`` method on the ``InheritanceManager`` or any
|
||||
``QuerySet`` from it, and the resulting objects will be instances of
|
||||
``Restaurant`` or ``Bar``:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from model_utils.managers import InheritanceManager
|
||||
|
||||
class Place(models.Model):
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
objects = InheritanceManager()
|
||||
|
||||
class Restaurant(Place):
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
|
||||
class Bar(Place):
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
|
||||
nearby_places = Place.objects.filter(location='here').select_subclasses()
|
||||
for place in nearby_places:
|
||||
# "place" will automatically be an instance of Place, Restaurant, or Bar
|
||||
|
||||
The database query performed will have an extra join for each subclass; if you
|
||||
want to reduce the number of joins and you only need particular subclasses to
|
||||
be returned as their actual type, you can pass subclass names to
|
||||
``select_subclasses()``, much like the built-in ``select_related()`` method:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
nearby_places = Place.objects.select_subclasses("restaurant")
|
||||
# restaurants will be Restaurant instances, bars will still be Place instances
|
||||
|
||||
``InheritanceManager`` also provides a subclass-fetching alternative to the
|
||||
``get()`` method:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
place = Place.objects.get_subclass(id=some_id)
|
||||
# "place" will automatically be an instance of Place, Restaurant, or Bar
|
||||
|
||||
If you don't explicitly call ``select_subclasses()`` or ``get_subclass()``,
|
||||
an ``InheritanceManager`` behaves identically to a normal ``Manager``; so
|
||||
it's safe to use as your default manager for the model.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
Due to `Django bug #16572`_, on Django versions prior to 1.6
|
||||
``InheritanceManager`` only supports a single level of model inheritance;
|
||||
it won't work for grandchild models.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _contributed by Jeff Elmore: http://jeffelmore.org/2010/11/11/automatic-downcasting-of-inherited-models-in-django/
|
||||
.. _Django bug #16572: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16572
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
TimeStampedModel
|
||||
================
|
||||
|
||||
This abstract base class just provides self-updating ``created`` and
|
||||
``modified`` fields on any model that inherits from it.
|
||||
|
||||
QueryManager
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
Many custom model managers do nothing more than return a QuerySet that
|
||||
is filtered in some way. ``QueryManager`` allows you to express this
|
||||
pattern with a minimum of boilerplate:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from django.db import models
|
||||
from model_utils.managers import QueryManager
|
||||
|
||||
class Post(models.Model):
|
||||
...
|
||||
published = models.BooleanField()
|
||||
pub_date = models.DateField()
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
objects = models.Manager()
|
||||
public = QueryManager(published=True).order_by('-pub_date')
|
||||
|
||||
The kwargs passed to ``QueryManager`` will be passed as-is to the
|
||||
``QuerySet.filter()`` method. You can also pass a ``Q`` object to
|
||||
``QueryManager`` to express more complex conditions. Note that you can
|
||||
set the ordering of the ``QuerySet`` returned by the ``QueryManager``
|
||||
by chaining a call to ``.order_by()`` on the ``QueryManager`` (this is
|
||||
not required).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
PassThroughManager
|
||||
==================
|
||||
|
||||
A common "gotcha" when defining methods on a custom manager class is that those
|
||||
same methods are not automatically also available on the QuerySets returned by
|
||||
that manager, so are not "chainable". This can be counterintuitive, as most of
|
||||
the public QuerySet API is mirrored on managers. It is possible to create a
|
||||
custom Manager that returns QuerySets that have the same additional methods,
|
||||
but this requires boilerplate code. The ``PassThroughManager`` class
|
||||
(`contributed by Paul McLanahan`_) removes this boilerplate.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _contributed by Paul McLanahan: http://paulm.us/post/3717466639/passthroughmanager-for-django
|
||||
|
||||
To use ``PassThroughManager``, rather than defining a custom manager with
|
||||
additional methods, define a custom ``QuerySet`` subclass with the additional
|
||||
methods you want, and pass that ``QuerySet`` subclass to the
|
||||
``PassThroughManager.for_queryset_class()`` class method. The returned
|
||||
``PassThroughManager`` subclass will always return instances of your custom
|
||||
``QuerySet``, and you can also call methods of your custom ``QuerySet``
|
||||
directly on the manager:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from datetime import datetime
|
||||
from django.db import models
|
||||
from django.db.models.query import QuerySet
|
||||
from model_utils.managers import PassThroughManager
|
||||
|
||||
class PostQuerySet(QuerySet):
|
||||
def by_author(self, user):
|
||||
return self.filter(user=user)
|
||||
|
||||
def published(self):
|
||||
return self.filter(published__lte=datetime.now())
|
||||
|
||||
def unpublished(self):
|
||||
return self.filter(published__gte=datetime.now())
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Post(models.Model):
|
||||
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
|
||||
published = models.DateTimeField()
|
||||
|
||||
objects = PassThroughManager.for_queryset_class(PostQuerySet)()
|
||||
|
||||
Post.objects.published()
|
||||
Post.objects.by_author(user=request.user).unpublished()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
FieldTracker
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
A ``FieldTracker`` can be added to a model to track changes in model fields. A
|
||||
``FieldTracker`` allows querying for field changes since a model instance was
|
||||
last saved. An example of applying ``FieldTracker`` to a model:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from django.db import models
|
||||
from model_utils import FieldTracker
|
||||
|
||||
class Post(models.Model):
|
||||
title = models.CharField(max_length=100)
|
||||
body = models.TextField()
|
||||
|
||||
tracker = FieldTracker()
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
``django-model-utils`` 1.3.0 introduced the ``ModelTracker`` object for
|
||||
tracking changes to model field values. Unfortunately ``ModelTracker``
|
||||
suffered from some serious flaws in its handling of ``ForeignKey`` fields,
|
||||
potentially resulting in many extra database queries if a ``ForeignKey``
|
||||
field was tracked. In order to avoid breaking API backwards-compatibility,
|
||||
``ModelTracker`` retains the previous behavior but is deprecated, and
|
||||
``FieldTracker`` has been introduced to provide better ``ForeignKey``
|
||||
handling. All uses of ``ModelTracker`` should be replaced by
|
||||
``FieldTracker``.
|
||||
|
||||
Summary of differences between ``ModelTracker`` and ``FieldTracker``:
|
||||
|
||||
* The previous value returned for a tracked ``ForeignKey`` field will now
|
||||
be the raw ID rather than the full object (avoiding extra database
|
||||
queries). (GH-43)
|
||||
|
||||
* The ``changed()`` method no longer returns the empty dictionary for all
|
||||
unsaved instances; rather, ``None`` is considered to be the initial value
|
||||
of all fields if the model has never been saved, thus ``changed()`` on an
|
||||
unsaved instance will return a dictionary containing all fields whose
|
||||
current value is not ``None``.
|
||||
|
||||
* The ``has_changed()`` method no longer crashes after an object's first
|
||||
save. (GH-53).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Accessing a field tracker
|
||||
-------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
There are multiple methods available for checking for changes in model fields.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
previous
|
||||
~~~~~~~~
|
||||
Returns the value of the given field during the last save:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: pycon
|
||||
|
||||
>>> a = Post.objects.create(title='First Post')
|
||||
>>> a.title = 'Welcome'
|
||||
>>> a.tracker.previous('title')
|
||||
u'First Post'
|
||||
|
||||
Returns ``None`` when the model instance isn't saved yet.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
has_changed
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
Returns ``True`` if the given field has changed since the last save:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: pycon
|
||||
|
||||
>>> a = Post.objects.create(title='First Post')
|
||||
>>> a.title = 'Welcome'
|
||||
>>> a.tracker.has_changed('title')
|
||||
True
|
||||
>>> a.tracker.has_changed('body')
|
||||
False
|
||||
|
||||
The ``has_changed`` method relies on ``previous`` to determine whether a
|
||||
field's values has changed.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
changed
|
||||
~~~~~~~
|
||||
Returns a dictionary of all fields that have been changed since the last save
|
||||
and the values of the fields during the last save:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: pycon
|
||||
|
||||
>>> a = Post.objects.create(title='First Post')
|
||||
>>> a.title = 'Welcome'
|
||||
>>> a.body = 'First post!'
|
||||
>>> a.tracker.changed()
|
||||
{'title': 'First Post', 'body': ''}
|
||||
|
||||
The ``changed`` method relies on ``has_changed`` to determine which fields
|
||||
have changed.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Tracking specific fields
|
||||
------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
A fields parameter can be given to ``FieldTracker`` to limit tracking to
|
||||
specific fields:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from django.db import models
|
||||
from model_utils import FieldTracker
|
||||
|
||||
class Post(models.Model):
|
||||
title = models.CharField(max_length=100)
|
||||
body = models.TextField()
|
||||
|
||||
title_tracker = FieldTracker(fields=['title'])
|
||||
|
||||
An example using the model specified above:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: pycon
|
||||
|
||||
>>> a = Post.objects.create(title='First Post')
|
||||
>>> a.body = 'First post!'
|
||||
>>> a.title_tracker.changed()
|
||||
{'title': None}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue